Penn & Teller TV – The Hurricane 1999 – The Long Memory 1952 - After Innocence 2005 - Spitting Image TV - Alastair Logan - Retrial by TV: The Rise and Fall of Rough Justice TV - The Night Of TV - Long Shot 2017
19,984. DNA exonerations have been responsible for releasing over 250 innocent people from prison. And it has helped expose case of prosecutorial misconduct all over the country. (Crime & Prison & Innocence & DNA & Justice & Miscarriage of Justice) Penn & Teller: Bullshit! Criminal Justice s8e7
96,610. Rozzer: I’m looking for two negroes in a white car.
Washington: Any two will do? (GBH Films & Black Culture & Miscarriage of Justice) The Hurricane 1999 starring Denzel Washington & Vicellous Reon Shannon & Deborah Kara Unger & Live Schreiber & John Hannah & Dan Hedaya & Debbi Morgan & Clancy Brown & David Paymer & Harris Yulin & Rob Steiger & Vincent Pastore & Beatrice Winde et al, director Norman Jewison, Washington and driver
96,707. What can I say … Boyd killed the other man with a poker. The Long Memory 1952 starring John Mills & John McCallum & Elizabeth Sellars & Eva Bergh & Geoffrey Keen & Michael Martin-Harvey & John Chandos & John Slater & Thora Hurd & Vida Hope & Harold Lang & Mary Mackenzie et al, director Robert Hamer
96,709. It was a choice between him and my father. ibid. lying witness
96,711. I’ve been hating you and planning revenge on you for twelve years … I can’t be bothered. I just can’t be bothered. ibid.
103,235. It breaks your soul down … It takes your decency and respect. (Innocence & Law & Court & Justice & Injustice & Miscarriage of Justice) After Innocence, 2005, victim
103,236. For every one of us up here, there’s hundreds more in prison. (Innocence & Law & Court & Justice & Injustice & Miscarriage of Justice) ibid. victims meet the press
103,237. It could happen to anybody, and it did. (Innocence & Law & Court & Justice & Injustice & Miscarriage of Justice) ibid. Barry Scheck
103,238. The found four different sperms in her and none of them were mine. (Innocence & Law & Court & Justice & Injustice & Miscarriage of Justice) ibid. victim of false rape charge
103,239. Now through DNA we have hard evidence that there is a lot more mistakes being made than we ever expected. That means there are thousands of people in jail today who could prove their innocence with DNA tests. (Innocence & Law & Court & Justice & Injustice & DNA & Miscarriage of Justice) ibid. Barry Scheck on Phil Donahue Show
103,240. My lawyer was the worst lawyer on the planet. The only time I saw him was at court. (Innocence & Law & Court & Justice & Injustice & Miscarriage of Justice) ibid. victim of false rape charge #2
103,535. Dimbleby, I refuse to believe that Tina Turner was responsible for framing the Tottenham 3. Spitting Image s11e3, ITV 1991
107,366. Recent events have cast into sharp relief the crisis in our criminal justice system. First there was the abandonment of the trial of three West Midland police officers on charges of perjury and attempting to pervert the course of justice. Then a woman was awarded £25,000 in damages after being subjected to verbal and physical abuse by police officers who had arrested her in flagrant abuse of their powers and given perjured evidence at her trial. Then the Home Secretary announced the abolition of the right to silence for detained persons held in police stations. Then a man who had been ‘verballed’ by West Midlands Police was awarded £70,000 in damages, after the fact that his interview notes had been forged was revealed by an EDSA test; he was the twentieth person to have had his conviction quashed in a case in which the investigating officers belonged to the Serious Crime Squad of that force. Most recently, the Home Secretary’s proposal to send more people to prison has been attacked by prison governors and half a dozen of the country’s senior judges.
The abandonment of the trial of the West Midlands police officers had been preceded by the trial of three Surrey police officers for perjury and attempting to pervert the course of justice – the trial was described in Ronan Bennett’s ‘Criminal Justice’ (LRB 24th June) which also raised the question of the trial of the West Midlands policemen.＊As solicitor to Partick Armstrong, one of the Guildford Four, since his arrest in 1974, I am very concerned about the way in which the trial of the three Surrey officers was approached by the prosecution, the defence and the judge, Mr Justice Macpherson.
To begin by recapping the events described by Bennett. In the aftermath of the release of the Guildford Four in 1989 the Director of Public Prosecutions instituted criminal proceedings against three Surrey police officers who had formed the team interviewing Patrick Armstrong. They were charged with conspiring to pervert the course of justice, the allegation being that they had given perjured evidence at the trial of the Guildford Four, during which they had claimed that a document they produced was a contemporaneous record of Mr Armstrong’s confession. The Crown case was that the document could not have been original and contemporaneous because it was the product of two earlier drafts that had been discovered by Avon and Somerset Police in May 1989. The document, the Crown alleged, was created to back up the police officers’ version of the interrogation, to create the impression that the information contained in Armstrong’s confession had been volunteered by him.
Since there was no evidence against the Guildford Four apart from their confessions, and since their defence was that they had falsely confessed, the credibility of the police officers was always crucial to the Crown case. During their trial in 1975 Mr Armstrong told the court, and refused to budge from his assertions despite rigorous cross-examination from Sir Michael Havers, that the content of his confessions had been largely suggested to him by the police officers and that he had said what they wanted him to say because their violence had terrified him and reduced him to tears. Mr Armstrong denied that the police officers had made a verbatim record, as they claimed at the trial, or that the ‘contemporaneous’ document was an accurate record of the interview. The officers were unable to say why it hadn’t been shown to Mr Armstrong and why he hadn’t been invited to sign it. The other defendants gave similar accounts of the violence. They were convicted because the jury chose to believe the police.
At the original trial the explosions at Guildford and Woolwich in October and November 1974 had been presented by the Crown as isolated acts of terrorism unconnected with any other event. That, to the Crown’s knowledge at the time, was untrue. The arrest of the IRA Active Service Unit in Balcombe Street in December 1975 required the prosecution to present a case against them which depended, apart from the admissions by two of the ASU, on the numerous forensic links to the offences which started in August 1974 and finished on their arrest. These links were identical to the forensic evidence discovered during the investigation into the Guildford and Woolwich offences and clearly demonstrated that Woolwich and Guildford were part of a connected series of events for which the Guildford Four could not have been responsible. The Crown went to extraordinary lengths during the course of the Balcombe Street trial to conceal these links. It even instructed Crown forensic scientists – as one was to testify to Sir John May – to alter their statements to remove reference to the evidence which connected the Guildford and Woolwich offences to the other crimes.
At the unsuccessful appeal of the Guildford Four in 1977, the Court of Appeal was content to accept the truth of the admissions of the Balcombe Street defendants. Their detailed confessions provided a wealth of hitherto unknown detail that exactly matched police forensic information and could only have been known to those who carried out the Guildford and Woolwich offences. Despite their admissions, no attempt was made by the police to interview the Balcombe Street defendants for these offences. The Surrey Police did send DCI Thomas Style, one of the three officers put on trial, to interview them, but despite their admissions to DCI Peter Imbert and the existence of a forensic statement which intimately linked the Guildford bombings to the Caterham bombing, DCI Style failed to ask them a single question about the Guildford bombings. No one was to tell the jury at his trial about this signal omission. Alastair Logan, essay A Sewer Runs Through It
107,375. In December 1983 a man walked free from prison after serving six years of a sentence for a murder which he did to not commit: his name was Mervyn Jock Russell and he was the first man in British history to have a conviction quashed as a result of a television programme … In the 1980s British television led by a series called Rough Justice mounted a sustained attack on the British criminal justice system uncovering miscarriage after miscarriage. (Miscarriage of Justice & Justice) Retrial by TV: The Rise and Fall of Rough Justice, BBC 2011
107,376. The Judiciary struck back. It was a system in denial. ibid.
107,377. It would run on the BBC for twenty-five years. (Miscarriage of Justice & Justice) ibid.
107,378. Rough Justice knew that the only thing that would sway appeal court evidence is new evidence. (Miscarriage of Justice & Justice) ibid.