We face a hostile ideology global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration ... A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea. Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations. This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together. Dwight D Einseinhower, farewell address to nation 17th January 1961
The case for government by elites is irrefutable. J William Fulbright, Senator and former Chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 1963 symposium: The Elite and the Electorate – Is Government by the People Possible?
The day of combination is here to stay. Individualism is gone, never to return. John D Rockefeller senior, cited The Economist online April 16th 1998
‘The United Nations,’ he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able – nor can it be able – to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand ... The New World Order that will answer economic, military, and political problems,’ he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.’ Governor Nelson Rockefeller, article The New York Times February article 1962, ‘Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order’
These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a New World Order. Nelson Rockefeller
New York Governor Nelson A Rockefeller says as President he would work towards international creation of a New World Order. Associated Press dispatch 26th July 1968
Somebody has to take governments’ place, and business seems to me to be a logical entity to do it. David Rockefeller, Newsweek International 1st February 1999
35,896. We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.
The supra-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practised in past centuries. David Rockefeller, disputed remarks at Bilderberg meeting June 1991
Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. David Rockefeller, Memoirs
The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary eco-systems is becoming appallingly evident. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population growth, over-consumption of resources and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. David Rockefeller
David Rockefeller is the most conspicuous representative today of the ruling class, a multinational fraternity of men who shape the global economy and manage the flow of its capital. Rockefeller was born to it, and he has made the most of it. But what some critics see as a vast international conspiracy, he considers a circumstance of life and just another day’s work ... In the world of David Rockefeller it’s hard to tell where business ends and politics begins. Bill Moyers
There will be a new form of global government. David de Rothschild, 7th November 2008
Anyone who knows how difficult it is to keep a secret among three men – particularly if they are married – knows how absurd is the idea of a worldwide secret conspiracy consciously controlling all mankind by its financial power, in real, clear analysis. Oswald Mosley, British wartime fascist leader
In short, the ‘house of World Order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’, to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault. Richard N Gardner, Foreign Affairs April 1974
We must establish a New World Order based on justice, on equity and on peace. Fidel Castro, United Nations 1979
Remember also, this cabal is one of many interconnected ones with fearsome power and ruthless intent to use it – Big Banks controlling the Federal Reserve and our money, Big Oil controlling our world energy resources, Big Media controlling our information, Big Pharma controlling our health, Big Technology controlling our state-of-the-art everything and watching us, Big Defense supplying the weapons of our wars, Big Pentagon waging them, and other corporate predators exploiting our lives for profit. Stephen Lendman
To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism and religious dogmas ...
We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests, our newspapers and others with vested interests in controlling us.
The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of the old people, these are the belated objectives ... for charting the changes of human behaviour. Brock Chisholm, director WHO
One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order. K M Heaton, The National Educator
Two centuries ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation. Now we must join with others to bring forth a New World Order. The Declaration of Inter-Dependence 30th January 1976
A new civilisation is emerging in our lives. This new civilisation brings with it new family styles, changed ways of working, loving and living. A new economy, new political conflicts, and beyond all this an altered consciousness as well. The dawn of this new civilisation is the single most explosive fact in our lifetimes. Alvin Toffler, The Third Way
World government is coming. In fact it is inevitable, no questions for or against it can change that fact. Norman Cousins, World Federalist Society
Their leader Pat Robertson has written in a book a few of years ago that we should have a world government but only when the messiah arrived. He wrote: any attempt to achieve world order before that time must the work of the Devil. Well join me. I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan. Walter Cronkite, accepting Norman Cousins’ Global Government Award
If we are to avoid that catastrophe [nuclear war], a system of World Order – preferably a system of world government, is mandatory. The proud nations someday will see the light, and, for the common good and their own survival yield up their precious sovereignty just as America’s thirteen colonies did two centuries ago. Walter Cronkite, A Reporter’s Life
The year is 1917 and representative Oscar Calloway enters a disturbing statement into the US Congressional record. The statement reveals why J P Morgan interests hired twelve high-ranking news managers. The twelve were asked to determine the most influential newspapers in America. They were to figure out how many news organisations it would take to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. The twelve found it was only necessary to purchase the control of twenty-five of the greatest papers ... Soon that policy would be defined by J P Morgan and his colleagues ... The Council on Foreign Relations. Beginner’s Guide to the New World Order documentary
A New World Order. Hubert H Humphrey, address to University of Pennsylvania, printed Pennsylvania Gazette 1977
We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the US-Soviet antagonisms. Brent Scowcroft, Washington Post May 1991