Noam Chomsky - John Milton - Baruch Spinoza - George Orwell - Benjamin Franklin - Mark Twain - The Monkey Trial TV - Daniel Gilbert - Paul Foot - McLibel 1997 - Steel & Morris - William O Douglas - Charles Bradlaugh - Herbert Hoover - Albert Einstein - Votaire - Michael Albert - Salman Rushdie - Louis D Brandeis - Oliver Wendell Holmes - Cuss Sunstein - George Washington - Herbert Hoover - H L Mencken - Colin Powell - Theodore Roosevelt - F D Roosevelt - Harry S Truman - Soren Kierkegaard - John Stuart Mill - Oscar Wilde - Christopher Hitchens - John Milton - Noam Chomsky - Yoani Sanchez - Winston Churchill - Mark Thomas - Cato - Robert G Ingersoll - William J Brennan - Sam Farr - Mike Godwin - Anthony Lewis - Anthony Kennedy - Ayaan Hirsi Ali - Julian Assange - Satoshi Kamata - Penn & Teller TV - Rumpole of the Bailey TV - Simon Heffer - Nobody Speak: Trials of a Free Press 2017 - The Post 2017 - John Lydon -
959. If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all. (Belief & Free Speech) Noam Chomsky
94,958. Like John Milton and other civil libertarians of the period, Locke held a sharply limited conception of freedom of expression. Noam Chomsky, Deterring Democracy
95,014. The right to freedom of speech in the United States was not established by the First Amendment to the Constitution, but only through dedicated efforts over a long period by the labor movement, the civil rights and anti-war movements of the 1960s, and other popular forces. ibid.
95,015. It is also worth recalling that victories for freedom of speech are often won in defence of the most depraved and horrendous views. The 1969 Supreme Court decision was in defense of the Ku Klux Klan from prosecution after a meeting with hooded figures, guns, and a burning cross calling for ‘burying the nigger’ and ‘sending the Jews back to Israel’. ibid.
5,355. Give me the liberty to know to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties. (Liberty & Civil Liberty & Free Speech) John Milton, Areopagitica 1644
38,548. The more a government strives to curtail freedom of speech, the more obstinately is it resisted; not indeed by the avaricious ... but by those whom good education, sound morality, and virtue have rendered more free. (Government & Free Speech) Baruch Spinoza
73,701. If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. (Free Speech & Liberty & Civil Liberties) George Orwell
73,708. If large numbers of people believe in freedom of speech, there will be freedom of speech, even if the law forbids it. But if public opinion is sluggish, inconvenient minorities will be persecuted, even if laws exist to protect them. George Orwell 1945
5,386. Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech. (Civil Liberties & Liberty & Free Speech) Benjamin Franklin
5,422. It is by the goodness of God that in our country we have those three unspeakably precious things: freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the prudence never to practise either of them. (Freedom & Free Speech & Civil Liberty) Mark Twain, Following the Equator
5,983. Darrow came to Dayton because he believed in free speech and because he wanted to challenge a man who was in many ways his polar opposite, William Jennings Bryan. (Evolution & Free Speech & Trial) The Monkey Trial, PBS
6,158. We live in a world in which people are censured, demoted, imprisoned, beheaded, simply because they have opened their mouths, flapped their lips, and vibrated some air. Yes, those vibrations can make us feel sad or stupid or alienated. Tough shit. That’s the price of admission to the marketplace of ideas. Hateful, blasphemous, prejudiced, vulgar, rude, or ignorant remarks are the music of a free society, and the relentless patter of idiots is how we know we’re in one. When all the words in our public conversation are fair, good, and true, it’s time to make a run for the fence. (Society & Words & Free Speech) Daniel Gilbert
27,080. Why do socialists deny free speech to fascists? After all, we are in favour of democracy. Socialist ideas flourish best where there are trade unions, public meetings, leaflets and newspapers which express different points of view. Imposing socialist ideas without that democratic debate is the opposite of real socialism.
Yet we deny these rights to the Nazis. Is this just the same sort of hypocrisy used by tyrants through the ages who have demanded free speech for themselves but seized the first opportunity to deny it to others? After all, runs our critics’ argument, the fascists are, like you, a minority. They have a ‘point of view’. Why should they be denied the right to put that point of view in the same way that you do?
There are two immediate answers. First, there is the connection between saying and doing. If an organised party goes around preaching race hatred against black people, as the British National Party does, that race hatred is bound to overflow into deeds ...
The other answer to the question why deny free speech to the fascists is that the central aim of fascism is to destroy democracy. This is not speculation, as it might have been before Mussolini came to power in Italy in 1922 or Hitler in Germany 11 years later. Now we know without any shadow of doubt that the aim of fascism is totally to destroy democracy and to remove the rights and freedoms of everyone except themselves ...
The single common aim of fascism in the 1930s was to break the strength and spirit of organised labour: to pave the way for uninterrupted profiteering by the people who own the means of production. Though its shock troops were the lumpen proletariat and the lower middle class, fascism’s real master was capital. When at least sections of the capitalists lost all hope of proceeding through the democratic system and the trade unions it had conceded under pressure in the past, it looked round for a battering ram to dispose of both. (Nazi & Fascism & Free Speech) Paul Foot, article May 1994 'Silencing the Nazi Threat'
42,458. A long time ago there was a company that made lots of money selling bits of meat between two bits of bread. Many people were employed to put the meat between the bread and many animals were killed to be the meat. A friendly clown persuaded children to love the company. Some decades passed and all was well. The company became very very rich. Richer even than many countries. And then some people wrote in their newspapers that eating lots of meat and bread could make people ill. Other people said on television that too many trees had been cut down and that the workers were unhappy. This made the company very angry. The company looked around the world and saw that in England there existed a special law that could stop people saying things the company didn’t like. And make them say sorry. (Corporation & Libel & Free Speech) McLibel (Two People Who Wouldn’t Say Sorry) 1997 ***** starring Helen Steel & David Morris & Eric Schlosser & Morgan Spurlock & Oliver Ford Davies, directors Franny Armstrong & Ken Loach, opening credits
42,459. 19th June 1997: the Royal Courts of Justice. (Corporation & Libel & Free Speech) ibid.
42,460. You have to stand up to them and say, No, I’m not going to do it. (Corporation & Libel & Free Speech) ibid. Helen Steel
42,461. One of the spies ... stole letters, broke into the office to take photographs, followed people home; we were infiltrated for about eighteen months by seven different spies. (Corporation & Libel & Free Speech & Spies) ibid. Dave Morris
42,462. At some meetings there were as many spies as campaigners. (Corporation & Libel & Free Speech & Spies) ibid. Dave Morris
42,463. Five of us in the group have received libel writs over the What’s Wrong With McDonald’s leaflets. (Corporation & Libel & Free Speech) ibid.
42,464. The world’s largest fast food business McDonald’s has begun a libel action at the high court against two environmental campaigners. (Corporation & Libel & Free Speech) ibid. BBC News 28th June 1994
42,465. We were defending ourselves. ibid. Helen Steel
42,466. Their own expert was saying, It’s a very reasonable thing to say. ibid.
42,467. The entire ad campaign ... was intrinsically deceptive. (Corporation & Libel & Free Speech & Advertisement) ibid. Stephen Gardner, Assistant US Attorney General
42,468. McDonald’s to try to justify themselves have had to bring all their big guns into the witness box. (Corporation & Libel & Free Speech) ibid. Dave Morris