Elkanah Walker - Penn & Teller TV - Richard Ellis - Steve Benson - Best Evidence: Bigfoot TV - Mystery 360: Bigfoot Revealed TV - Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science TV - Jimmy Chilcutt - Legend of Bigfoot TV - CTVW5: There's Something Out There TV - Bob Gimlin - Michael Day - Bill Munns - David Begun - Nina Jablonski - Karl Korff - Clyde Reinke - The World's Greatest Hoaxes TV - Todd Neiss - Elmer Skip Frombach - Sergeant Larry Gamache - Tim Martindale - Edeas Felix - Jeffrey Meldrum - Paranormal? Bigfoot TV - Bigfoot Encounters: Paranatural TV - David Daegling - Darus R Swindler - Finding Bigfoot TV - Ancient Aliens TV - Bigfoot Files TV - Morgan Matthews TV - Conspiracy Files Unsealed TV - Bigfoot: The Missing Evidence TV - Bernard Heuvelmans - Destination Truth TV - In Search of Aliens TV - The Office US TV - Bigfoot Captured TV - America's Book of Secrets TV - Ancient Mysteries TV - South American Squatch of Argentina TV - Bigfoot: The Mysterious Monster 1976 - Trailer Park Boys: Out of the Park Europe 2016 - Manbeast! Myth or Monster 1978 TV - In Search of ... TV - MonsterQuest TV -
65,194. They hunt and do all their work at night ... They frequently come in the night and steal their salmon from their nets and eat them raw. If the people are awake they always know when they are coming very near, which is most intolerable. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Elkanah Walker, The Diary of Elkahah Walker 1838-1848
65,195. Cryptozoologists want you to believe that there are monsters running about in the world. And that we could find these amazing creatures if only we spent more time and money ... Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster are complete bullshit. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology & Loch Ness) Penn & Teller, Bullshit! Cryptozoology s4e4
65,196. According to legend Bigfoot is a seven to nine feet tall hairy-ape like creature that walks on two feet. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) ibid.
65,197. The market for Bigfoot images is huge. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) ibid.
65,198. In order for science to accept the existence of Bigfoot or Sasquatch we need real evidence. We don’t need fuzzy photographs and we don’t need plastic footprints. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Richard Ellis, research associate The American Museum of Natural History
65,199. Mormons seems to have a peculiar – and prejudiced – fascination with tales of a large, ominous, ape-like, black-skinned Bigfoot (who, they swear, is actually Cain), condemned by the Mormon God to wander the Earth where he ends up scaring the faithful into invoking the Mormon priesthood in order to drive the big, bad, black Bigfoot away. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Steve Benson, board post 17th August 2011, ‘Bigoted on Bigfoot: Why Mormons Believe in a Big, Black, Hairy, Degenerate, Sinful and Miserable Bigfoot Creature Named Cain’
65,200. Sightings of Bigfoot date back a thousand years. Natives of North America’s Pacific north-west long ago gave it a name: Sasquatch. Two-and-a-half meters tall and weighing over three hundred and fifty kilos, it’s been described as a massive primate. Unlike a gorilla, this animal walks on two legs. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Best Evidence: Bigfoot
65,201. Of the thousands of people who have claimed over the years to have seen the creature, the best known are Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin. Their fifty-nine seconds of film  is either a key piece of evidence or an elaborate hoax. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) ibid.
65,202. The footprints from the site of the 1967 film were compared with over two hundred samples of mysterious big feet. Dr Meldrum has the largest collection of alleged Sasquatch tracks in the world. Because of the precise and consistent anatomy of the prints, widespread geographical locations, and corroboration by what are said to be credible sightings, he’s convinced that an undeniable pattern is emerging. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) ibid.
65,203. In the last fifty years over 3,700 Bigfoot sightings have been reported in the US and Canada. More commonly in the Pacific north-west than in any other region. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Mystery 360: Bigfoot Revealed
65,204. With coaching, an actor can imitate the walk of the Patterson Bigfoot. It’s an important piece of supporting evidence for the hoax theory. But this fact alone does not disprove it was a man in a fur costume. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) ibid.
65,205. If such a suit was virtually unavailable at the time, does that lead us to the conclusion that the Bigfoot was real? The creature in the film seems to have more anatomical detail than the technology of the 1960s allowed. In the film several muscle groups are visible in the lower limbs ... All the factors help the case that this is a living creature, not a vintage Hollywood costume. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) ibid.
65,206. The creature is known to native Americans as Sasquatch. Wild man. Known as Yeti. Or Bigfoot. With over four hundred sightings each year and hundreds of footprint files this mystery continues to provide us with clues about a possible un-catalogued animal. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science
65,207. In 1994 another video camera briefly captured a similar figure in the Blue Mountains of Eastern Washington State. Paul Freeman, a forest service employee at the time, had been noticing tell-tale footprints of a Sasquatch in the area. This time he had his camera ready, and captured something extraordinary. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) ibid.
65,208. Height, stride, bulk and speed can all be measured by comparing the moving animal to fixed objects seen in the backgrounds. The backgrounds of the Patterson and Freedman footage have changed dramatically over the years due to encroaching forest growth or human activity. However, the sight of the Memorial Day footage remains much as it did when the footage was recorded in 1996. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) ibid.
65,209. Now these casts were cast twenty years apart, hundreds of miles apart, yet they have the same ridge texture and rich flow pattern. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Jimmy Chilcutt, former fingerprint examiner & primate fingerprint specialist
65,213. I was up-track in the mountains and I found these tracks: they look much like human footprints but they were eighteen inches long, six and a half across the ball of the foot, five and a half at the heel. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Legend of Bigfoot
65,214. Bigfoot fever peeked in the early 70s after the release of sixteen seconds of footage shot by Roger Patterson in northern California. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) CTVW5: There’s Something Out There
65,215. There stood a big hairy human-like creature. It appeared to be between six and seven feet tall. The creature looked at us for a few seconds, turned and walked slowly away. It was in a kind of loamy type soil; left good footprints. It walked directly away from us at just a slow stroll. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Bob Gimlin, televised interview
65,216. I first saw that clip about thirty years ago and I thought it was a hoax then and I think it’s a hoax now. It looks very much to me like a man in a monkey suit ... The most convincing thing was the way the coat ripples – it is not attached as it were to the underlying flesh. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Professor Michael Day, Natural History Museum
65,217. The most curious thing that I’ve found is in the leg proportions themselves. We have a very long upper leg and a very short lower leg by comparison. This particular configuration is exceedingly rare on human beings. The anatomical proportions of the body are extremely unusual, and suggest to me that it would be very very hard to find a human being who has the appropriate anatomy to wear a suit even if you made one. All of these add up to something that in my mind is biologically real, and not a human in any type of costume. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) Bill Munns, film researcher/graphic artist, given access to Gimlin/Patterson film
65,218. It just strikes me as unlikely that after all of these years there would be no concrete evidence of this extremely large primate, if it really existed. (Bigfoot & Cryptozoology) David Begun, University of Toronto