There are reasons why the Bush-Cheney administration and its Pentagon would have staged the 9/11 attacks to make them appear to have been orchestrated by Muslim terrorists from the Middle East. This administration wanted to control this oil from the Caspian Sea area, had made plans to go to war in Afghanistan months before 9/11. It also, as is now well known, had an attack on Iraq at the top of the agenda when it came to office. Finally, General Wesley Clark has revealed the Pentagon under this administration was planning on attacking six more predominantly Muslims countries: Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. Accordingly, the idea that 9/11 was an inside job with evidence planted to make it appear to be the work of Middle Eastern Muslims should not be ruled out a priori. Indeed, those with responsibility to discover what really happened including our major media should have been alert to evidence that it was a False Flag attack. Professor David Ray Griffin, interview Guns and Butter 7th January 2009
On the 7th of July 2005 London was hit by a series of explosions ... The story presented by the media of that tragic day is nothing more than a conspiracy. A conspiracy used by police, government and the media to cover up a far more sinister truth. The story we’ve been told is as follows: four British Muslim men exploded backpack bombs as part of the continuing jihad from Al Qaeda cells. The suicide bombings were an attack on Britain. Eye on Britain: The Search for Truth
London is equipped with more CCTV cameras than any city on Earth ... On the number 30 bus not one out of the four security cameras were working that day ... This bus heading for Hackney Wick was also the only bus to be diverted that day after the first three explosions had gone off ... Contrary evidence to the official report suggests that the explosions on board the trains and bus could not have been caused by explosives held in backpacks. Eye-witnesses reported that the floor of the trains were pushed upward as if the explosion had come from underneath the train ... There was no 740 train from Luton to Kings Cross Thames Link station on July 7th ... Somehow, in an explosion which completely destroyed steel carriages, passports made of paper survived. According to West Yorkshire police, a highly trained terrorist cell able to elude authorities managed to leave a car in Luton Station Car Park with a boot full of explosives to be found later by police. Why has a paper trail been left that allows the investigation to go in only one direction? ibid.
National polls before 7/7 2005 showed that a pro-war Labour was sure to lose. The British government needed a pretext to join with George Bush in the War on Terror. 7/7 created the perfect spectre to convince Britons to relinquish their liberty in the name of security. And the blame could be put on Iraq to legitimise the crusade and cash in on the trillion-dollar royal and military weapons contracts. And ultimately to succumb to the New World Order. ibid.
During the Cold War NATO along with intelligence agencies armed and funded stay-behind armies to act as resistance in the event of a Soviet invasion. Inquires carried out by the Belgium and Italian parliaments established that Operation Gladio was behind several atrocities across Western Europe in the 1970s and ’80s. Gladio teams carried out terrorist operations as part of a strategy of tension. The resulting fear was used to manipulate public perception, while the blame was put on political dissidents. Adrian Connock and David Shayler, 9/11 and the BBC
We are supposed to believe it was some kind of coincidence there was also an anti-terrorist drill going on on 7/7, and again, just like 9/11 they were talking about attacks on the same targets at the same tube stations at exactly the same time as the actual attack happened ... providing some kind of cover for what must be operations orchestrated in some way by the state. David Shayler, former MI5 agent
Rather curiously, there are no reliable witnesses who reported seeing the four so-called suicide bombers that day in London. In fact, some people have reported that the police tried to pressure them into saying they had seen the four suicide bombers. According to the official narrative, the police recovered documents bearing the name of Khan and Tanweer from the bomb site close to Aldgate Station by midnight on the 7th. David Shayler, Mind the Gap
Unconfirmed reports by Stagecoach employees have suggested that irregular maintenance work took place on the bus on the weeks prior to 7/7. Although almost all London buses have CCTV, the three cameras on the bomb bus were not working that day. There has been no official explanation for this. The entire attack should have been caught on traffic cameras, yet no footage has ever been released. ibid.
They are still funding international terrorism. David Shayler
It’s [7/7] a very convenient way of ensuring there is fear, of ensuring that there is control and of ensuring that those who are in the know – and of course we cannot tell you because it is all secret – are in a position of extreme power. Michael Meacher MP
What the British public have been presented with is in fact a complex but contradictory series of lies. Ludicrous Diversion: 7/7 Bombings, 2006
We’ve been told an inquiry would prejudice the current investigation. We’ve been told an enquiry would prevent the police and government from focusing on future attacks [sic] ... Take too much time, cost too much money and divert resources away from the War on Terrorism ... And we have been told by the prime minister himself that a public enquiry would be a ludicrous diversion. ibid. citing ministers’ statements
Identifying documentation for Mohammad Sidique Khan was for some reason found at three out of the four bombsites; or the issue of what explosives were used, something that incredibly is described in the narrative as ‘still under expert examination’ more than a year after the attacks; or the fake Al Qaeda confession released on the internet a few hours after the attacks through a server in Texas; or the training exercises taking place in London that day based on a scenario of bombs going off at the exact same times and the exact same stations as the attacks occurred; or the huge amount of money made in speculating the rise and fall of Sterling the result of either foreknowledge of the event or extraordinary luck; or the arrest of Haroon Aswat widely reported by the UK media as being the mastermind behind the attacks, and by the US media of being an agent for MI5; or the strange mistake regarding the time of the train taken by the men from Luton that morning – the police, the press and the government narrative all reported that the men took the 7:40 departure; but as discovered by bloggers and the alternative media the 7:40 was cancelled that day. ibid.
Like most of the evidence purported to condemn these men, Khan’s Will and Testament has never been shown to the public and has therefore never been scrutinised or confirmed to be real. Khan’s video confession makes no actual reference to him blowing himself up and is said by people who knew him to show him several years ago and has never been shown in its entirety. Since the narrative’s release, we have also seen a video by Shehzad Tanweer. Again, Tanweer makes no reference to his suicide, and we have never seen the whole film. Even if these videos are genuine, they are not evidence that the men were responsible for the London bombings. If there is no evidence of remote detonation at the bombsites, why did the New York police, based on what the British police had told them, report at a conference, the bombs were set off using mobile phones? The same remote timing devices used in the Madrid bombings in 2004. The eye-witness’ accounts of the bombers fiddling with their rucksacks are extremely dubious. ibid.
No CCTV footage has been released to the public; all we have seen are three still images: one shows Hussain alone entering the ticket hall at Luton Station, inexplicably cropped so it does not show the other three men who should all be around him; the second shows Hussain again alone outside Boots in King’s Cross Station apparently at 9 a.m. ten minutes after he was supposed to be dead and at a time when Kings Cross Station was being evacuated; and the third shows four figures entering Luton Station, three of whom have blurred faces but only Hussain is actually identifiable. There are no images of the four men together in London. In fact there are no images of any of the train bombers in London that day at all. ibid.
The car in which they travelled to Luton is said to have contained explosive devices but it’s never been explained why the men would have left them there when embarking on a suicide mission. The devices were reportedly destroyed in controlled explosions. ibid.
Why did the government say the bombers travelled on a train that never ran? What was this van from a controlled demolition firm doing next to the blown-up bus? Were these men suicide bombers or were they framed? The Conspiracy Files, BBC 2009
Some of those on board were telling a Guardian journalist of how an explosion had come from beneath the train. ibid.
What are the chances of three London Underground train stations being targeted on the same day at the same time as three ‘terror drills’ with almost the exact same scenario being acted out? PSTV.tv – Kollerstrom & Farrell
Mr Richard Jones – everything was wrong with his story. ibid.
The head of MOSAD in a German newspaper clearly stating that they had advance information. ibid.
Rudolph Giuliani – what was he doing in London? ibid.
The Jaguar at Luton Car Park ... a dummy run, a practice run, on 28th June, the week before, show that that Jaguar was also there on the same spot. A minder who was there to meet those lads. ibid.
What were the bombs? ... black pepper and peroxide? ibid.
The Edgware Road underground train ... Three large holes in its floor. The damage did not resemble that from a rucksack within the coach. ibid.
... 6 at Edgware Road, 7 at Aldgate ... Those dead bodies are totally accounted for by real human victims; what that means is there isn’t one left over who could be the terrorist. ibid.
They were just ordinary normal lads. ibid.
A couple of weeks later – John Charles de Menezes ... Another police killing; a whole pack of lies told around it. ibid.
Blair initially said that any such enquiry would be a ludicrous diversion in the struggle against terrorism. 7/7 The Big Picture, 2010
Accounts of what happened on July 7th are contrasting and varied. Nothing we’ve been officially told makes any sense. ibid.
The four British Muslim men allegedly responsible may have themselves been victims of a much larger conspiracy. ibid.
There is virtually no forensic physical evidence in the public domain. ibid.
The 7.48 train would not have got the four to London in time to catch the tube trains they supposedly bombed. ibid.
The 7.40 train was cancelled that morning. ibid.
In the frames from Woodhall Motorway Services Shehzad Tanweer is clearly shown wearing white trousers. But in the pictures of the four men entering Luton Station Tanweer’s trousers are black. ibid.
In the footage of the four going through the ticket barrier and down on to the platform the time-codes are largely blurred out. ibid.